all stories

SC reduces 3-year practice requirement for lawyers to join judicial services to one

Rising2 outlets reported this in 3 reports over 2 days
Fri, 21 August 2026peak 2 reports on Thu, 27 August 2026Thu, 27 August 2026

What it is about

Vibha MakhijaColin GonsalvesJustice Surya KantJustice ChandranAugustine George MasihHigh CourtSupreme Court OnHigher Judicial ServicesJudicial AcademyThird All India Judges AssociationJunior DivisionIndiaVipin SanghiVivek Narayan SharmaSiddharth SijoriaSupreme CourtSanjay Karol

Who published it, and when

original reportfirst to report
webindia123.com1 original report
Times of India1 original report
21 Aug, 09:58over 6 days27 Aug, 21:06

1 report left out of the cascade - too little in common with the story to place

How it spread - 3 original reports

  1. Fri, 21 August 2026

    1 report
  2. Thu, 27 August 2026

    2 reports
    • Times of India11:54

      The Supreme Court reduced judicial service practice from three years to one. This change sparks debate on courtroom experience versus structured training. Former Justice Vipin Sanghi advocates for retaining the three-year practice period. Lawyers Vivek Narayan Sharma and Siddharth Sijoria believe the new framework can succeed. The discussion centers on readiness for judicial responsibilities and accessibility.

    • Times of India21:06

      The bench also directed states/Union territories and high courts to conduct periodic training and sensitisation programmes for judicial officers, police officials, prosecutors, protection officers, counsellors through judicial academies, police training institutions and other appropriate bodies. A bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Augustine George Masih said there was a need for time-bound completion of trial in dowry cases and directed the high courts to periodically review pending criminal...

One email a week

The stories everytrace watched stay alive - how many independent outlets carried each one, and how long it lasted. No daily digest, no breaking-news alerts.