Coronary sinus reducer no better than sham procedure in angina without obstruction
One daysingle sourceOne outlet reported this, once - no second voice in this corpus.
All 1 reports on Wed, 4 November 2026
What it is about
Kevin ChengJay WidmerJohnson Johnson MedtechUnited StatesImperial College LondonCanadian Cardiovascular Society AnginaAmerican College Of Cardiology Interventional CouncilBaylor Scott White Medical CenterBrompton, Medway, United KingdomCanadianSan Diego, California, United StatesLondon, London, City Of, United Kingdom
Who published it, and when
How it spread - 1 original report
Wed, 4 November 2026
1 report- healio.com00:00first to report
In patients with refractory angina and coronary microvascular dysfunction but no obstructed coronary arteries, a coronary sinus reducer did not improve coronary microvascular function, symptoms and quality of life, researchers reported.The single-center investigator-initiated REMEDY-PILOT trial, presented at TCT 2026, compared the performance of a coronary sinus reducer (Shockwave Reducer,