Listen live: Supreme Court takes up Guam WWII munitions dispute
After publishing: 1 description edited1 change
- The Hillseen 7 Oct, 23:12description edited
what the description said, before and after
The Supreme Court on Wednesday wrestled with a case about whether the Air Force needs to conduct environmental review before its munitions detonations in Guam. An environmental group, Prutehi Guåhan, has sued, saying that the decision to file a permit renewal application with the Guam Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) constitutes an agency action that triggered...The Supreme Court on Wednesday wrestled with a case about whether the Air Force needs to conduct environmental review before its munitions detonations in Guam. An environmental group, Prutehi Guåhan, has sued, saying the decision to file a permit renewal application with the Guam Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) constitutes an agency action that triggered environmental...
What it is about
Who published it, and when
How it spread - 4 original reports
Wed, 7 October 2026
4 reports- The Hill12:49first to report
The Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday about which environmental requirements the government must follow when handling unexploded WWII-era munitions in Guam. For decades, the government has brought the munitions to Anderson Air Force Base. It agrees it must follow the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, which lays out procedures specifically for hazardous waste. But...
- kgou.org16:03
Guam is suing the U.S. Air Force over its practice of blowing up old munitions there.
- The Hill17:25edited after publishing
The Supreme Court on Wednesday wrestled with a case about whether the Air Force needs to conduct environmental review before its munitions detonations in Guam. An environmental group, Prutehi Guåhan, has sued, saying the decision to file a permit renewal application with the Guam Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) constitutes an agency action that triggered environmental...
- Al Jazeera English18:16
Advocacy group claims military sidestepped impact review, says case highlights lack of representation in US territories.