'Modified Form 6 not approved by us': What SC said on EC decisions linked to SIR
What it is about
Who published it, and when
6 reports left out of the cascade - too little in common with the story to place
How it spread - 10 original reports
Mon, 5 October 2026
3 reports- Times of India09:51
- Times of India10:48
- Times of India14:09
Tue, 6 October 2026
1 report- hindustantimes.com01:32first to report
Rahul Gandhi's post came after the Supreme Court on Monday clarified that it had not approved any modification to Form 6. | India News
Mon, 12 October 2026
3 reports- siasat.com08:09
The Supreme Court on Monday, said it had not adjudicated upon the new Form 6 while hearing the matter related to the SIR in Bihar.
- Times of India09:51
The Supreme Court addressed the controversy surrounding the new Form 6 used for voter registration. It clarified that it had not approved changes to the declaration regarding electoral rolls. The court's remarks arose during a hearing on the functioning of the Election Commission of India. Concerns were raised over the legality of the changes introduced in Form 6. The Supreme Court will further examine this issue in October.
- thehindubusinessline.com15:12
SC clarifies it neither approved nor disapproved Form 6 alterations linked to Bihar SIR, urging proper lawmaking for changes.
Tue, 13 October 2026
2 reports- Times of India00:50
- Times of India17:37
Ashok Lavasa stressed the importance of the Election Commission regaining trust during recent protests over electoral roll irregularities. He highlighted concerns regarding the integrity of the Special Intensive Revision exercise and its impact on voter rights. The commission's credibility is questioned due to dissent among its members and lack of transparency in decision-making. Prakash Raj labeled the exercise as detrimental to democracy, extending criticism to ruling party actions.
Sun, 18 October 2026
1 report- deccanchronicle.com08:39
Petitioner sought directions to restore their electoral entries and permit correction and transposition of their names through Form 8 instead of requiring them to seek fresh inclusion through Form 6